Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Richmond, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $444,200 |
| White | 39% | 62% |
| Black | 20% | 9% |
| Asian | 14% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 49% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Richmond has a smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 108853 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z