Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Pasadena
This post compares Richmond, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $689,700 |
| White | 39% | 53% |
| Black | 20% | 10% |
| Asian | 14% | 16% |
| With Kids | 34% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 49% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Pasadena?
A: Richmond has a similar population count than Pasadena: 108853 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Richmond versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z