Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Napa
This post compares Richmond, California to Napa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Napa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 79,722 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $51,449 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $536,800 |
| White | 39% | 76% |
| Black | 20% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 49% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Napa?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than Napa: 108853 compared with 79722 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Napa?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Napa?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Richmond versus 43% for Napa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z