Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Lancaster
This post compares Richmond, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $213,100 |
| White | 39% | 62% |
| Black | 20% | 21% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Lancaster?
A: Richmond has a smaller population count than Lancaster: 108853 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Richmond versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z