Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to La Verne
This post compares Richmond, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $535,900 |
| White | 39% | 74% |
| Black | 20% | 4% |
| Asian | 14% | 7% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 49% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or La Verne?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than La Verne: 108853 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z