Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Foster City
This post compares Richmond, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 39% | 43% |
| Black | 20% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 47% |
| With Kids | 34% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 49% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Foster City?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than Foster City: 108853 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z