Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Beverly Hills
This post compares Richmond, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 39% | 82% |
| Black | 20% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 9% |
| With Kids | 34% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 49% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Beverly Hills?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 108853 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z