Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Ashland
This post compares Richmond, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Richmond (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 108,853 | 24,477 |
Income (median) | $42,533 | $40,407 |
Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $396,400 |
White | 39% | 44% |
Black | 20% | 17% |
Asian | 14% | 20% |
With Kids | 34% | 42% |
Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
Rentals | 49% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Ashland?
A: Richmond has a much larger population count than Ashland: 108853 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z