Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Altadena
This post compares Richmond, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $649,800 |
| White | 39% | 53% |
| Black | 20% | 22% |
| Asian | 14% | 6% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 49% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Altadena?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than Altadena: 108853 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z