Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to South San Francisco
This post compares Rialto, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Rialto (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 102,708 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $35,478 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $697,400 |
White | 61% | 33% |
Black | 12% | 2% |
Asian | 2% | 39% |
With Kids | 52% | 34% |
Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or South San Francisco?
A: Rialto has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 102708 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Rialto versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z