Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to San Francisco
This post compares Rialto, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rialto (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,708 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $35,478 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 61% | 47% |
| Black | 12% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 34% |
| With Kids | 52% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 36% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or San Francisco?
A: Rialto has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 102708 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Rialto versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z