Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to Lancaster
This post compares Rialto, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rialto (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,708 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $35,478 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $213,100 |
| White | 61% | 62% |
| Black | 12% | 21% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 52% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 36% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or Lancaster?
A: Rialto has a smaller population count than Lancaster: 102708 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Rialto versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z