Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to Irvine
This post compares Rialto, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rialto (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,708 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $35,478 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $753,400 |
| White | 61% | 47% |
| Black | 12% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 41% |
| With Kids | 52% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or Irvine?
A: Rialto has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 102708 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Rialto versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z