Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to Foster City
This post compares Rialto, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rialto (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,708 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $35,478 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 61% | 43% |
| Black | 12% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 47% |
| With Kids | 52% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 36% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or Foster City?
A: Rialto has a larger population count than Foster City: 102708 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Rialto versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z