Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to Foothill Farms
This post compares Rialto, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rialto (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,708 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $35,478 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 61% | 67% |
| Black | 12% | 9% |
| Asian | 2% | 5% |
| With Kids | 52% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 36% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or Foothill Farms?
A: Rialto has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 102708 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Rialto versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z