Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rialto to Atwater
This post compares Rialto, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Rialto (city) | Atwater (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 102,708 | 29,118 |
Income (median) | $35,478 | $35,415 |
Home Value (median) | $260,200 | $179,400 |
White | 61% | 58% |
Black | 12% | 3% |
Asian | 2% | 4% |
With Kids | 52% | 48% |
Age (median) | 30 | 30 |
Rentals | 36% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rialto or Atwater?
A: Rialto has a larger population count than Atwater: 102708 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rialto or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rialto.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rialto or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rialto.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Rialto versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rialto may include: Victorville, Patterson, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z