Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to South San Francisco
This post compares Reedley, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $697,400 |
| White | 73% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or South San Francisco?
A: Reedley has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 25419 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Reedley versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z