Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to San Bruno
This post compares Reedley, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $754,700 |
| White | 73% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 28% |
| With Kids | 43% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or San Bruno?
A: Reedley has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 25419 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Reedley versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z