Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to Riverbank
This post compares Reedley, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $247,200 |
| White | 73% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 4% |
| With Kids | 43% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or Riverbank?
A: Reedley has a similar population count than Riverbank: 25419 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Reedley does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Reedley versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z