Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Reedley, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $633,400 |
| White | 73% | 75% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 13% |
| With Kids | 43% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or Pleasant Hill?
A: Reedley has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 25419 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Reedley versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z