Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to Lancaster
This post compares Reedley, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $213,100 |
| White | 73% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 21% |
| Asian | 3% | 4% |
| With Kids | 43% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or Lancaster?
A: Reedley has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 25419 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Reedley versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z