Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to Foster City
This post compares Reedley, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 73% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 47% |
| With Kids | 43% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or Foster City?
A: Reedley has a similar population count than Foster City: 25419 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Reedley versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z