Compare-Cities.com
Compare Reedley to Belmont
This post compares Reedley, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Reedley (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,419 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $32,215 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,100 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 73% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 27% |
| With Kids | 43% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Reedley or Belmont?
A: Reedley has a similar population count than Belmont: 25419 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Reedley or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Reedley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Reedley or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Reedley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Reedley versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Reedley may include: Sanger, Visalia, and Brawley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z