Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redwood City to South San Francisco
This post compares Redwood City, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redwood City (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84,368 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $70,131 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,016,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 60% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 39% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redwood City or South San Francisco?
A: Redwood City has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 84368 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redwood City or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redwood City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redwood City or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redwood City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Redwood City versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redwood City may include: San-Mateo, Campbell, and San-Rafael.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z