Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redwood City to San Fernando
This post compares Redwood City, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redwood City (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84,368 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $70,131 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,016,700 | $370,300 |
| White | 60% | 57% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 1% |
| With Kids | 32% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 49% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redwood City or San Fernando?
A: Redwood City has a larger population count than San Fernando: 84368 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redwood City or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redwood City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redwood City or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Redwood City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Redwood City versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redwood City may include: San-Mateo, Campbell, and San-Rafael.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z