Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redwood City to San Bruno
This post compares Redwood City, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redwood City (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84,368 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $70,131 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,016,700 | $754,700 |
| White | 60% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 28% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redwood City or San Bruno?
A: Redwood City has a larger population count than San Bruno: 84368 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redwood City or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redwood City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redwood City or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redwood City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Redwood City versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redwood City may include: San-Mateo, Campbell, and San-Rafael.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z