Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redwood City to Riverbank
This post compares Redwood City, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redwood City (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84,368 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $70,131 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,016,700 | $247,200 |
| White | 60% | 79% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redwood City or Riverbank?
A: Redwood City has a larger population count than Riverbank: 84368 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redwood City or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redwood City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redwood City or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Redwood City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Redwood City versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redwood City may include: San-Mateo, Campbell, and San-Rafael.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z