Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redondo Beach to South San Francisco
This post compares Redondo Beach, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redondo Beach (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,950 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $82,056 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $817,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 72% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 12% | 39% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redondo Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Redondo Beach has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 67950 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redondo Beach or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redondo Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redondo Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redondo Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redondo Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Redondo Beach versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redondo Beach may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Pleasant-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z