Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Stockton
This post compares Redlands, California to Stockton, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Stockton (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 304,358 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $40,298 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $220,600 |
| White | 71% | 43% |
| Black | 7% | 11% |
| Asian | 7% | 21% |
| With Kids | 33% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 42% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Stockton?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Stockton: 70765 compared with 304358 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Stockton?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Stockton?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Stockton does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 52% for Stockton.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z