Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to South El Monte
This post compares Redlands, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $389,400 |
| White | 71% | 59% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 14% |
| With Kids | 33% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 42% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or South El Monte?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than South El Monte: 70765 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z