Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Selma
This post compares Redlands, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $171,200 |
| White | 71% | 78% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 42% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Selma?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Selma: 70765 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z