Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to San Marcos
This post compares Redlands, California to San Marcos, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | San Marcos (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 93,493 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $50,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $455,700 |
| White | 71% | 71% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 9% |
| With Kids | 33% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 42% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or San Marcos?
A: Redlands has a similar population count than San Marcos: 70765 compared with 93493 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in San Marcos?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or San Marcos?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 38% for San Marcos.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z