Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to San Bruno
This post compares Redlands, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 71% | 49% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 33% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or San Bruno?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than San Bruno: 70765 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z