Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Roseville
This post compares Redlands, California to Roseville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Roseville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 130,705 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $64,526 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $386,300 |
| White | 71% | 78% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 9% |
| With Kids | 33% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 42% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Roseville?
A: Redlands has a smaller population count than Roseville: 70765 compared with 130705 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Roseville?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Roseville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 35% for Roseville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z