Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Rosemont
This post compares Redlands, California to Rosemont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Redlands (city) | Rosemont (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 70,765 | 23,700 |
Income (median) | $54,151 | $45,979 |
Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $237,900 |
White | 71% | 60% |
Black | 7% | 11% |
Asian | 7% | 10% |
With Kids | 33% | 32% |
Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
Rentals | 42% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Rosemont?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Rosemont: 70765 compared with 23700 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Rosemont?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Rosemont?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rosemont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 44% for Rosemont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z