Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Riverside
This post compares Redlands, California to Riverside, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Riverside (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 321,570 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $41,576 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $319,200 |
| White | 71% | 61% |
| Black | 7% | 6% |
| Asian | 7% | 7% |
| With Kids | 33% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 31 |
| Rentals | 42% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Riverside?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Riverside: 70765 compared with 321570 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Riverside?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Riverside?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 45% for Riverside.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z