Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Riverbank
This post compares Redlands, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 71% | 79% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 42% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Riverbank?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Riverbank: 70765 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z