Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Redlands, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $444,200 |
| White | 71% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 33% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 42% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 70765 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z