Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Porterville
This post compares Redlands, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Redlands (city) | Porterville (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 70,765 | 58,782 |
Income (median) | $54,151 | $36,312 |
Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $163,100 |
White | 71% | 77% |
Black | 7% | 0% |
Asian | 7% | 4% |
With Kids | 33% | 48% |
Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
Rentals | 42% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Porterville?
A: Redlands has a similar population count than Porterville: 70765 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z