Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Petaluma
This post compares Redlands, California to Petaluma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Redlands (city) | Petaluma (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 70,765 | 60,210 |
Income (median) | $54,151 | $63,243 |
Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $556,900 |
White | 71% | 78% |
Black | 7% | 0% |
Asian | 7% | 4% |
With Kids | 33% | 32% |
Age (median) | 35 | 41 |
Rentals | 42% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Petaluma?
A: Redlands has a similar population count than Petaluma: 70765 compared with 60210 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Petaluma?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Petaluma?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 33% for Petaluma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z