Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Palm Springs
This post compares Redlands, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $340,600 |
| White | 71% | 83% |
| Black | 7% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 54 |
| Rentals | 42% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Palm Springs?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 70765 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z