Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Los Angeles
This post compares Redlands, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $549,800 |
| White | 71% | 52% |
| Black | 7% | 8% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 33% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 42% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Los Angeles?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 70765 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z