Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Lancaster
This post compares Redlands, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $213,100 |
| White | 71% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 21% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 42% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Lancaster?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 70765 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z