Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Irvine
This post compares Redlands, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $753,400 |
| White | 71% | 47% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 41% |
| With Kids | 33% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 42% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Irvine?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 70765 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z