Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Foster City
This post compares Redlands, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 71% | 43% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 33% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 42% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Foster City?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Foster City: 70765 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z