Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Folsom
This post compares Redlands, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Folsom (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 75,897 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $84,884 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $456,600 |
| White | 71% | 69% |
| Black | 7% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 16% |
| With Kids | 33% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 42% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Folsom?
A: Redlands has a similar population count than Folsom: 70765 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z