Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Cudahy
This post compares Redlands, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Cudahy (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 24,146 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $26,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $327,500 |
| White | 71% | 77% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 0% |
| With Kids | 33% | 60% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 27 |
| Rentals | 42% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Cudahy?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Cudahy: 70765 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z