Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Corona
This post compares Redlands, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $411,600 |
| White | 71% | 66% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 33% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 42% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Corona?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Corona: 70765 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z