Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Burbank
This post compares Redlands, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $574,300 |
| White | 71% | 70% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 33% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Burbank?
A: Redlands has a smaller population count than Burbank: 70765 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z