Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Beverly Hills
This post compares Redlands, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 71% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 9% |
| With Kids | 33% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 42% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Beverly Hills?
A: Redlands has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 70765 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z